In reply to:
Serafim Batzoglou
@s_batzoglou
·
647d
The statement '@s_batzoglou To get started, not to finish' is part of a conversation thread discussing the funding and strategic approach to AI development, specifically neurosymbolic AI versus large language models (LLMs). The tone is constructive, and the intent seems to be to contribute to the dialogue on how to effectively allocate resources in AI research. The content suggests a preference for beginning with a smaller investment to establish a foundation before seeking additional funds.
- The statement does no harm and is focused on contributing to a constructive discussion on AI funding strategies. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by suggesting a practical approach to a complex issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by proposing a starting point for funding without attacking any individual or idea. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to contribute to a better approach in AI development, which could benefit society if successful. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.