In reply to:
Christopher Manning
@chrmanning
·
645d
The statement is a critical response to a conversation about the nature of language learning in transformer neural networks. It challenges the notion that language models learn language in the same way humans do, suggesting that the process is more complex and prone to errors. The tone is corrective and somewhat skeptical, aiming to clarify a misconception.
- The statement does not intend to harm but to correct a misconception. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, with no indication of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying a complex technical issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication of a mistake made by the speaker that needs correcting.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to contribute to a better understanding of a scientific issue, which could benefit society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.