In reply to:
Christopher Manning
@chrmanning
·
645d
The statement is part of a conversation about investment in AI technology, specifically driverless cars, and the effectiveness of such investments. It is a critique of the hype surrounding the technology and the lack of generalizable solutions despite significant funding. The tone is critical and the intent is to challenge the effectiveness of the investments made in the AI field.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to critique the current state of investment in AI, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by advocating for more effective use of resources. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.