Andrew Yang

The statement provides an opinion on the motivations of a party involved in the sale of a sports franchise, suggesting that the individual is attempting to renegotiate a completed deal due to changes in valuation. The tone is critical but not disrespectful, and the intent seems to be to clarify the nature of business transactions and express disapproval of what is perceived as an attempt to renege on an agreement.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved, without engaging in harassment or hate speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the actions rather than the individual. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to discuss business ethics, which could be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by advocating for integrity in business dealings. [+1]