Gary Marcus

The statement appears to be a critical commentary on OpenAI's aspirations and potential societal impact, particularly regarding employment. It references a conversation about a board member's view on AI's ability to replace human labor and expresses concern over the consequences of such technological advancements.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not seem to intend harm but expresses a critical viewpoint on the potential negative impact of AI on employment.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the actions of a company rather than individuals. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks a promotion of understanding, empathy, and compassion, as it does not offer solutions or constructive engagement with the issue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but does not engage in constructive dialogue or offer alternatives, and the use of the term 'biggest fools' could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement aims to use influence to caution against potential societal harm, but it does so in a way that may not contribute positively to society.
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech but may not use the platform with complete integrity due to the lack of constructive engagement.