In reply to:
Paul Topping (@paultopping.bsky.social)
@PaulTopping
·
542d
The statement is part of a conversation about artificial general intelligence (AGI) and large language models (LLMs), which are topics related to technology and its development. The tone is informative and contributes to a technical discussion on the potential pathways to achieving AGI. The intent is to clarify the distinction between AGI and LLMs and to argue that LLMs, as they currently function, may not be sufficient for achieving AGI. The content engages with the debate on the efficacy of LLMs in the context of AGI development.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others; it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement uses words to promote understanding of a complex technical issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of LLMs without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to contribute to a technical discussion that could benefit society by clarifying the challenges in developing AGI. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.