In reply to:
Serafim Batzoglou
@s_batzoglou
·
541d
The statement is part of a conversation about the success and investment in Large Language Models (LLMs) versus Symbolic AI. It questions the criteria for success, implying that making profits should not be the only measure. The tone is inquisitive and slightly critical.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement indirectly promotes understanding by questioning the criteria for success in AI investments. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement encourages a reflection on the impact of AI on society, which could lead to betterment if it prompts a more holistic view of success in technology. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.