The statement poses a critical question about the investment in technology for autonomous driving and artificial general intelligence (AGI), suggesting skepticism about the current state of technology's ability to achieve full autonomy. It engages with public issues of technological development and investment, which is a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but rather to provoke thought on the effectiveness of current investments in technology. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not target any individuals but rather industry leaders as a whole. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement indirectly promotes understanding by questioning the effectiveness of current approaches, which could lead to a deeper discussion on the topic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the broader industry perspective. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to question and potentially redirect societal investments in technology for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly raising a question about public investment without spreading misinformation or causing harm. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.