Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
3/31/2024, 5:11:38 PM
X
In reply to:
rhizome
@aapp952
·
468d
@GaryMarcus @emollick Bro loads of people are looking at your favoured neurosymbolic approaches too.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
468d
@emollick the problem is we need R into approaches that aren’t LLMs, because LLMs have many intrinsic problems.

it’s those problems that mean there will be an eventual bust.
Ethan Mollick
@emollick
·
468d
R typically comes before D.

We have better insight in LLM timing than in most industries. It is over a year to go from startup to GPT-4 class model even with infinite money (Musk, Google).

I don’t think that this tells us anything about whether we are in a bubble or a boom.
/MachineLearning
@slashML
·
469d
WSJ: The AI industry spent 17x more on Nvidia chips than it brought in in revenue https://www.reddit.com/r/Machine…

The conversation thread discusses the state of research and development in the AI industry, specifically the challenges of funding and competition for talent in relation to neurosymbolic approaches versus large language models (LLMs). The tone is informative and analytical, with a focus on industry insights and concerns about sustainability and direction of AI research.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is focused on sharing information about the AI industry. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, with no indication of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding of the AI industry's challenges, though it does not directly address empathy or compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism about the direction of AI research without personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to inform about the AI industry, which could contribute to better decision-making in society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly to share industry insights. [+1]