Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
3/31/2024, 5:13:51 PM
X
In reply to:
rhizome
@aapp952
·
468d
@GaryMarcus @emollick Combination of the two is very exciting . Deepmind doing lots of work on this . Demis cutting through the hype today as well .
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
468d
@aapp952 @emollick with orders of magnitude less $, though. which makes it hard to compete for talent, etc
rhizome
@aapp952
·
468d
@GaryMarcus @emollick Bro loads of people are looking at your favoured neurosymbolic approaches too.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
468d
@emollick the problem is we need R into approaches that aren’t LLMs, because LLMs have many intrinsic problems.

it’s those problems that mean there will be an eventual bust.
Ethan Mollick
@emollick
·
468d
R typically comes before D.

We have better insight in LLM timing than in most industries. It is over a year to go from startup to GPT-4 class model even with infinite money (Musk, Google).

I don’t think that this tells us anything about whether we are in a bubble or a boom.
/MachineLearning
@slashML
·
469d
WSJ: The AI industry spent 17x more on Nvidia chips than it brought in in revenue https://www.reddit.com/r/Machine…

The statement is part of a conversation about the development and competition within the AI industry, specifically discussing the work of DeepMind and OpenAI. The tone is informative and contributes to a larger discussion on AI research approaches and industry dynamics. The content addresses public issues related to technology development and industry competition.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm with words or actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, avoiding cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement contributes to understanding by sharing an opinion on AI research progress. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by comparing the work of two AI organizations without personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to inform about AI industry developments, potentially contributing to societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly sharing an opinion in a public forum. [+1]