The statement appears to be an expression of surprise and a commentary on the policies surrounding the use of generative AI tools in coding. It touches on the issue of intellectual property and the ethics of AI development, which can be considered a matter of public concern.
- The statement does no harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement indirectly promotes understanding by highlighting a potential inconsistency in the use of AI tools. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but rather presents a critique of a policy. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a concern that could lead to a betterment of society by sparking discussion on AI ethics and policies. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly sharing an opinion on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.