Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
4/1/2024, 11:55:08 PM
X
In reply to:
Blake Lemoine
@BlakeALemoine
·
457d
@GaryMarcus @X @OpenAI Cool cool. So @sama just gets to rake in millions by enabling scammers. Seems legit.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
457d
@BlakeALemoine @X @OpenAI zero liability, afaik
Blake Lemoine
@BlakeALemoine
·
457d
@GaryMarcus An interesting question occurs to me. I wonder what percentage of the many many scammer bots on @X are powered by @OpenAI. I wonder what degree of liability they incur through that.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
457d
Or anything else, if and when their AI progresses?
Toby Walsh
@TobyWalsh
·
458d
If OpenAI can't (or won't) moderate the GPT store, why should we believe they'll moderate harmful uses of the Voice Engine?

The statement is part of a conversation thread on Twitter that discusses the responsibility and liability of OpenAI in moderating content created by their technology, specifically in relation to scammer bots and potential harmful uses. The tone of the conversation is critical and raises concerns about the ethical implications of AI technology and its governance. The intent is to question and hold accountable the creators and profiteers of AI technology for the potential negative impacts of their products. The content directly addresses societal issues related to technology, ethics, and corporate responsibility.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to do harm with words and actions, but it does raise concerns about potential harm caused by others.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement indirectly promotes understanding by raising awareness of a potential issue, but it does not directly promote empathy or compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of OpenAI's practices, but it could be perceived as bordering on a personal attack against @sama for profiting from enabling scammers. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to question and potentially better society by holding corporations accountable for their technology's impact. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to responsibly raise important ethical questions. [+1]