The statement is part of a conversation about the validity of predictions regarding artificial general intelligence (AGI) and the potential bursting of the AGI bubble. It is a personal endorsement of Gary Marcus's stance on the issue, which is a topic of public interest within the tech and scientific community. The tone is supportive, the intent is to affirm Gary Marcus's position, and the content is a subjective agreement with his views on AGI.
- The statement does no harm as it is a positive endorsement. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, with no evidence of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by aligning with a viewpoint that encourages a realistic approach to AGI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by supporting a call for a paradigm shift in AGI without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to endorse a viewpoint that could lead to a more cautious and informed approach to AGI, potentially benefiting society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.