In reply to:
David Manheim
@davidmanheim
·
230d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
230d
The statement is part of a conversation about the role of AI in replacing human jobs and the economic implications of such technological advancements. It engages with the public issue of AI's impact on the workforce and the success or failure of various AI projects. The tone is informative and critical, and the intent is to contribute to the ongoing debate about AI and employment.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement uses words to promote understanding of the AI's impact on jobs. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication of mistakes being made or corrected.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to inform and contribute to the societal debate on AI. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.