Gary Marcus

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -1
4/2/2024, 4:48:01 PM
X
In reply to:
Kömpileir e/acc↗️
@Kompileir
·
230d
@GaryMarcus @theinformation Duuuuuuude, closing down something and waiting until it's ready is common.

There's always going to be wrinkles to be ironed out. You know this.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
230d
@Kompileir dude, they just closed it down, i linked @theinformation story earlier, and it seems that it couldn’t get to run in accurately real time and needed a bunch of humans in the loop to verify.

it just didn’t work well enough without those humans.
Kömpileir e/acc↗️
@Kompileir
·
230d
@GaryMarcus What do you mean? The amazon grocery stores could easily be stocked by bots at night and allow walk out shopping during the day.

The only pattern I'm seeing is discreditation.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
230d
Amazon couldn’t make its grocery stores work without humans behind the scenes.
ChatGPT probably wouldn’t work without a lot of humans behind the scenes.
Cruise couldn’t work without a lot of humans behind the scenes.
Facebook’s M didn’t work without a lot of humans behind the… https://twitter.com/GaryMarcus/s…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
230d
🪦AI (or nearly dead for the foreseeable future AI)

• Amazon Just Walk Out
• Apple’s Car
• Cruise as L5 self-driving
• Facebook M
• Facebook solving Fake News (as promised to US Senate 2019)
• Google Duplex
• Tesla fleets of robotaxis
• radiologist replacement

What…

The statement is part of a conversation about the challenges and delays in the development and implementation of AI technologies, such as driverless cars and automated radiologists. The tone is somewhat skeptical and critical, expressing disappointment in the unmet promises of AI advancements. The intent is to highlight the gap between the promises of AI technology and its current capabilities. The content specifically addresses the issue of technology not being ready for what has been promised, implying a need for more realistic expectations and perhaps more transparency in the tech industry.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not intend to harm but rather expresses a critical perspective on the state of AI technology. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not directly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a broader conversation about the realistic expectations of AI.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the technology rather than individuals. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement indirectly uses influence to encourage a more honest discourse about AI technology's capabilities, which could lead to better societal outcomes. [+1]