Gary Marcus

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -1

The statement expresses concern about the security vulnerabilities of large language models and predicts potential negative outcomes if these issues are not addressed. It is a cautionary perspective on the development and deployment of AI technologies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to raise awareness about a potential harm, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others as it does not target any individual or group. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement implicitly promotes understanding by highlighting a potential issue with AI technologies, which could lead to a more informed public. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement is critical but does not offer constructive criticism or dialogue, as it does not provide specific solutions or engage with opposing viewpoints. [-1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement acknowledges a potential mistake in the reliance on LLMs without addressing security concerns. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to discuss a societal issue responsibly, although it could be seen as lacking in integrity if the prediction is not based on substantiated evidence.