In reply to:
Geoffrey Miller
@primalpoly
·
229d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
229d
The statement expresses concern about AI safety and acknowledges the potential risks associated with current AI systems. It suggests a conditional support for AI, predicated on the establishment of trustworthiness in AI systems. The tone is cautionary and constructive, aiming to contribute to the ongoing discussion about AI safety and ethics.
- The statement is cautious and does not incite harm or fear, but rather highlights the importance of safety. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by focusing on the collective need for trustworthy AI systems. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging both the potential of AI and the need for safety. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites constructive criticism and dialogue by implicitly asking for more explicit safety measures in AI. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement is open to correction by suggesting that the speaker could have been more explicit about the conditions for supporting AI. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a responsible approach to AI development. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by engaging in a respectful and responsible manner. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.