The statement is a critique of the investment in AI, specifically targeting the partnership between OpenAI and Microsoft, and the broader concept of driverless cars. It questions the value and practicality of these investments, suggesting they have not yet yielded significant returns and may not be the best use of resources. The tone is critical and the intent is to provoke thought and discussion about the direction and efficacy of AI investments.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but is critical in nature.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the investment rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does invite reflection on AI investment priorities.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to influence the conversation about AI investment for what the author sees as the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.