Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement addresses the issue of AI model evaluation standards and the problem of a model being fine-tuned on a test set, which is a topic of public interest within the AI community.
- The statement is informative and does not cause harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not violate privacy or dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could foster a better understanding of AI evaluation practices. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites discussion and is critical of current standards. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By highlighting a flaw in AI evaluation, the statement could contribute to improvements in the field. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly exercises free speech by discussing a relevant issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.