Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 91
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
292d
Do you know how many times a day execs at major AI companies come to me and say, “Gary, you have spent over three decades studying natural intelligence, and have often correctly foreseen the limits of current systems. What could we learn from natural intelligence that might help…
4/4/2024, 11:06:28 PM
X
In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
292d
@GaryMarcus care more how?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
292d
Baffling combination of arrogance and ignorance. You would think that people who want to build artificial intelligence would care more about natural intelligence.

But they mostly don’t.
James Marinero🇺🇦
@jamesmarinero
·
292d
@GaryMarcus What puzzles me is that so many apparently intelligent commentators do not understand what intelligence is, and how far away current systems are from AGI (if indeed current systems/architectures are capable of that development).

The statement is part of a conversation on social media that discusses the development of artificial intelligence and its comparison to natural intelligence. The tone is critical and analytical, with an intent to question the approach and understanding of AI by those in the field. The content addresses the issue of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and the perceived disconnect between the pursuit of AGI and the understanding of natural intelligence.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by questioning the approach to AI development. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to question and potentially improve the field of AI. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly. [+1]