Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 91
4/4/2024, 11:07:36 PM
X
In reply to:
jack sumatra
@jacksumatra
·
292d
@GaryMarcus i guess your perspective doesn’t align with the objectives of delusion and hype
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
292d
Do you know how many times a day execs at major AI companies come to me and say, “Gary, you have spent over three decades studying natural intelligence, and have often correctly foreseen the limits of current systems. What could we learn from natural intelligence that might help…
James Marinero🇺🇦
@jamesmarinero
·
292d
@GaryMarcus What puzzles me is that so many apparently intelligent commentators do not understand what intelligence is, and how far away current systems are from AGI (if indeed current systems/architectures are capable of that development).

The statement questions the intentions of AI companies in their pursuit of AGI, suggesting skepticism about whether their goals are genuine or driven by the desire for publicity. It is a critical perspective on the motivations behind the development of advanced AI technologies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not seem to intend harm but expresses a critical viewpoint. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does raise a valid concern about the intentions behind AGI development.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement indirectly uses influence to question the integrity of AI development, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by encouraging transparency and honesty. [+1]