Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 91
4/5/2024, 4:10:22 PM
X
In reply to:
Trent Fowler | futuratipodcast.com
@Trent_STEMpunk
·
293d
@GaryMarcus @wowtht @pmddomingos There is nothing inherently wrong with wealth inequality, insane or otherwise, and I don’t decide the answers to moral questions on the basis of whether people will throw a fit or not.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
293d
@Trent_STEMpunk @wowtht @pmddomingos looking forward to riots on the street, are we? public sentiment against AI is already rising. couple that with insane inequality of wealth and the AGI era (when it comes) will indeed be wild.
Trent Fowler | futuratipodcast.com
@Trent_STEMpunk
·
293d
@wowtht @GaryMarcus @pmddomingos No. That's also far too high.
Dre
@wowtht
·
298d
@Trent_STEMpunk @GaryMarcus @pmddomingos why don’t we return to Reagan standards then? True conservatism right? Was 61% average under Reagan.
Trent Fowler | futuratipodcast.com
@Trent_STEMpunk
·
298d
@GaryMarcus @pmddomingos Correct. It's far, far too high.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
299d
@pmddomingos No

The statement is part of a conversation on Twitter that touches upon the topic of wealth inequality and its moral implications, which is a substantive public issue. The tone of the statement is somewhat resigned, indicating a belief that the person's opinion is unlikely to change the minds of those with a different viewpoint. The intent seems to be to express a moral stance on the issue of wealth inequality and the consequences of actions related to it.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions, but it does express a moral judgment. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not discourage it either.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by expressing a moral viewpoint without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to express a moral viewpoint, which could be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by raising awareness about the consequences of wealth inequality. [+1]