Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 105
4/6/2024, 3:16:03 PM
X
In reply to:
Jonas Andrulis
@JonasAndrulis
·
412d
@DanraeP @GaryMarcus @WSJ Isn't dreaming targeted (relevance and novelty focused) data augmentation?
Danrae Pray
@DanraeP
·
412d
@GaryMarcus @WSJ This whole data augmentation thing feels a lot like the AI analogue of the perpetual motion machine 😅
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
413d
My god, people just have no memory. New @WSJ article is about using to synthetic data to rescue LLMs.

People started doing the same in 2016 or so for self-driving cars.

8 years later “data augmention” still hasn’t solved the edge case problem for AVs, and it’s not going to…

The statement is a technical critique of data augmentation in AI and its limitations, contributing to the public discourse on AI development.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is a professional critique. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding of AI methodologies. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement provides constructive criticism. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement indirectly contributes to societal betterment through informed AI development.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement is a responsible exercise of free speech. [+1]