Reposted by Ilhan Omar
The statement is a critique of those who defended Israel's actions in a conflict, suggesting they were either mistaken or dishonest in their claims about the blockage of aid. It references a specific development where Israel approved the activation of bakeries and the reopening of a waterline in Gaza, which the author implies contradicts previous defender claims.
- The statement implies that defenders of Israel's actions may have caused harm by spreading misinformation or lies, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not appear to violate the privacy or dignity of others, nor does it engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it accuses others of being fools or liars. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but borders on personal attacks by suggesting those who disagree are fools or liars, which is not constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.