The statement appears to be a personal account of an individual's experience within the field of artificial intelligence, specifically regarding deep learning and GenAI. The tone seems to be one of frustration or disappointment, and the intent is to express a viewpoint on the state of the field and the treatment of the individual's warnings about its limitations. The content suggests a history of the individual raising concerns that they feel have been ignored or suppressed.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but expresses a personal grievance.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not violate privacy or dignity, nor does it engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.ย [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not oppose them either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement hints at a lack of constructive dialogue but does not provide enough context to evaluate fully.ย [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no acknowledgment of mistakes, but the context for such is not provided.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement does not clearly indicate an influence for the betterment of society.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not provide enough context to assess the use of the platform's responsibility and integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.