Gary Marcus

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 68
4/7/2024, 3:09:06 PM
X
In reply to:
Jersey Joe
@FinTwitAnons
·
439d
@GaryMarcus Interesting. I guess I’m thinking examples like interpreting/summarizing large data/documents for closer analysis. Maybe that’s not even AI in your definition.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
439d
@FinTwitAnons possibly. but so far the best positive one (as opposed to misinformation which it is well-suited to) is coding, and that one is actually problematic: https://www.gitclear.com/coding_…
Jersey Joe
@FinTwitAnons
·
439d
@GaryMarcus Doesn’t AI have powerful use cases as long as expectations are kept realistic?

The statement is part of a conversation about the use of AI in coding and its potential impact on code quality. It is a critical response to a claim about AI's usefulness, pointing out potential issues and risks associated with AI-assisted development. The tone is cautionary, and the intent is to contribute to a discussion on the implications of AI in a specific professional field.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to caution against potential harm caused by AI without causing harm itself. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, with no indication of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the issue of AI in coding. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to inform about potential risks in AI-assisted development, which could be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by fostering informed decision-making. [+1]