In reply to:
Santy Gegenschatz
@santygegen
·
537d
The statement is part of a conversation regarding a prediction about AI's future capabilities, which could be considered a public issue. However, the tone and content of the statement are conversational and do not substantively engage with the issue. It appears to be a light-hearted response to a challenge about the timing of a prediction, rather than a substantive contribution to the discourse on AI development.