Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 96
4/9/2024, 4:18:26 PM
X
In reply to:
Dr Patrick M. - AI Builder
@patmcguinness
·
537d
@GaryMarcus The AI vs human comparison metrics are all quite subjective.
IMHO "smarter" isn't useful. If your AI can only take IQ tests, nothing else, is that AGI?
To make it objective, you need specific tasks and specific metrics, without reference to expectations of human performance.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
what exactly does “smarter than any one human” mean? an AI that is smarter than the dumbest human we can find? or able to beat any single human on some random task? better than a human that doesn’t have access to the internet?
Sam AI
@Sam_Talkbot
·
537d
@GaryMarcus "My guess is we'll have AI smarter than any one human around the end of next year.".. not 2029 at all bro!!

The statement is part of a conversation about artificial intelligence and its comparison to human intelligence. The tone is inquisitive and suggests a desire for a more in-depth discussion on how to objectively measure AI intelligence. The intent is to contribute to an ongoing debate about AI metrics and to propose further discussion on the topic. The content is focused on the need for specific tasks and metrics to assess AI intelligence without comparing it to human performance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is focused on advancing the conversation. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, with no indication of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by suggesting a more objective approach to measuring AI intelligence. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the current metrics and proposing a discussion for improvement. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to contribute to a significant societal debate about AI. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly contributing to the public discourse on AI. [+1]