Wetterschneider
@Stretchedwiener
·
538d
The statement engages in a discussion about the current state and potential future of language learning models (LLMs) and their applications, such as robotaxis and chatbots. It reflects on the unmet expectations and speculates on what could have been achieved. The conversation involves a critique of the progress in autonomous vehicle technology and AI, referencing public figures and companies active in this field. It constitutes public discourse as it addresses technological advancements, their societal impact, and the discourse around them.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but expresses disappointment in the progress of LLMs. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not directly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the progress in AI without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement indirectly suggests a desire for technological advancements that could benefit society, although it does not actively use influence to promote betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.