Wetterschneider
@Stretchedwiener
·
538d
The statement is part of a conversation about the development and implementation of AI technology, specifically in the context of self-driving cars and robotaxis. It expresses skepticism about the current state and future promises of AI, referencing claims made by companies and public figures in the tech industry. The tone is critical and implies disappointment or frustration with the gap between expectations and reality.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions, but rather expresses a critical perspective on AI development. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not directly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a broader discussion about the realistic expectations of AI technology.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the AI industry without personal attacks, focusing on the technology rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to prompt a discussion about the responsible development and marketing of AI, which could be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by encouraging realistic expectations and accountability. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.