Gary Marcus

The statement is critical and speculative, suggesting that reported benchmarks may not fully represent real-world performance and hinting at the possibility of targeted training to improve benchmark results. It contributes to a broader conversation about the reliability and transparency of AI model performance reporting.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm as it raises legitimate concerns about performance reporting. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not target individuals but rather discusses a product's performance. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the potential discrepancy between reported benchmarks and actual performance. [+1]
4. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a potential issue with performance reporting without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement acknowledges the mixed reception of the AI model's performance, which is a form of correcting or contributing to the broader understanding of the model's capabilities. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement uses the platform to discuss the implications of AI performance on society responsibly. [+1]