Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement is part of a conversation on Twitter regarding the future of artificial intelligence (AI) and the approaches needed to achieve trustworthy AI. The tone is inquisitive and slightly critical, questioning the efforts of those not aligning with the points laid out by @GaryMarcus. The intent is to provoke thought and reflection on the direction of AI research and development. The content refers to specific approaches to AI that @GaryMarcus advocates for, such as neurosymbolic hybrid AI, large-scale knowledge with an innate core, better reasoning, and explicit, dynamically updatable cognitive models.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by referencing specific AI approaches and encourages reflection on the direction of AI research. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the efforts of those not working toward the advocated points without engaging in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to provoke thought on the betterment of AI for society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by engaging in a responsible and integrity-filled discussion on AI. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.