The statement is part of a conversation on Twitter regarding the development of trustworthy AI. It involves a public figure in the field of AI, Gary Marcus, discussing the necessary components for creating reliable AI systems. The tone is assertive and somewhat challenging, as the speaker is willing to acknowledge if they are proven wrong about their beliefs on AI development. The intent is to contribute to the ongoing debate about the best approach to AI, and the content specifically addresses the criteria the speaker believes are essential for trustworthy AI.
- The statement does not intend to harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by sharing specific criteria for trustworthy AI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by challenging others to prove the criteria wrong or right. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The speaker expresses a willingness to acknowledge and correct their mistakes if proven wrong. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to contribute to the betterment of AI development in society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.