Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
4/14/2024, 1:37:32 AM
X
In reply to:
AGI.Eth
@ceobillionaire
·
648d
@GaryMarcus Devin is just a wrapper and an ill conceived early example.

Agentic AI could be structured like in The Consciousness Prior and strategically organized as constructs.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
648d
@ceobillionaire like Devin? 🤨
AGI.Eth
@ceobillionaire
·
648d
@GaryMarcus Agentic AIs, using these LLMs, are just getting started, however . . .
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
648d
This is potentially a pretty big deal.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
648d
Preliminary empirical evidence, quantitative and qualitative, that LLMs have a reached a point of diminishing returns.

• MMLU benchmark showed huge jumps from GPT 2 to GPT 3 and from GPT 3 to GPT 4, not so much for Turbo, 13 months later.
• NYT Connections shows similar…

The statement is part of a conversation about the reliability and potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the context of artificial intelligence development. It expresses skepticism about the current state of LLMs and their application in creating agentic AI. The tone is critical but not disrespectful, and the intent seems to be to temper expectations about the technology's capabilities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it is a critical perspective in a technical debate. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not target any individuals personally. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a broader understanding of the limitations of LLMs.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the technology rather than individuals. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to contribute to a realistic perspective on AI development, which could be seen as bettering society by setting appropriate expectations. [+1]