Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement is part of a conversation about artificial intelligence (AI) and engages with the public issue of AI development and its limitations. It addresses the debate between two prominent figures in the field, Yann LeCun and Gary Marcus, and their differing approaches to AI. The statement expresses a preference for Marcus's approach due to its focus on the problem of generalization in AI, which the commenter feels LeCun ignores.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by expressing a preference for one approach over another without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to contribute to the discussion on AI, which could be seen as for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.