In reply to:
Blake Lemoine
@BlakeALemoine
·
640d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
640d
The statement provides a statistical perspective on the safety of autonomous vehicles, suggesting that while the technology is impressive, there is still room for improvement. It contributes to the dialogue on the engineering challenges and safety standards in the development of driverless cars.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm as it is a factual comment on safety statistics. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not target any individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is not bullying, harassing, or hateful. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a factual basis for comparison between human and autonomous driving safety. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement is open to correction if new data emerges, as it is based on current statistics. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to inform the public about the current state of autonomous vehicle safety. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by contributing to a public debate responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.