Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
4/15/2024, 6:22:26 PM
X
In reply to:
claudia brown's ex-hubby
@claudia_exhubby
·
639d
@Okitwist @GaryMarcus @BasedBeffJezos Hes really going to be owned just any day now when these llms things just start working. I can't wait for them to just work which will happen so soon.
SpaceTechRocks
@Okitwist
·
639d
@GaryMarcus @BasedBeffJezos Imagine listening to Gary Marcus over the likes of Andrej Kartparhy who are actually in the trenches pushing the envelope of these systems 😂. If these LLM things end up working , Gary Marcus will have to shutdown his account because the joy of seeing him trying to explain his…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
639d
Dear @basedbeffjezos,
1. “get better quickly” is pure hopium. See my recent newsletter on diminishing returns, for actual data.
2. If you truly believed in acceleration, you would want to see multiple approaches, and instead of going all in one that is already known to have…
Beff Jezos — e/acc ⏩
@BasedBeffJezos
·
640d
Literally just needs faster and better AI inference in cloud. Something with 10 trillion dollars of capital behind it soon.

Most problems in the review seem to be due to the GPT4 backend itself hallucinating or being slow, which will get better quickly.

The statement is part of a public discourse on AI technology and its future potential. It expresses the individual's frustration over not being credited for accurate predictions and suggests that experts are aligning with their viewpoint.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may not foster constructive dialogue due to its dismissive tone towards others' opinions. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on personal vindication. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    While not engaging in personal attacks, the statement does not constructively address the disagreement.