Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement expresses a personal preference for a piece of analysis on Generative AI, specifically the 'LLMentalist Effect.' The intent seems to be to share information and potentially spark interest or discussion about the content of the analysis. The content of the linked article suggests a critical examination of Generative AI and its impact on human cognition, which could contribute to a broader conversation about technology and society.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm with words or actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By sharing an analysis, the statement could promote understanding of Generative AI's effects on human cognition. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement itself does not engage in criticism or dialogue, but the linked content may provide constructive criticism of Generative AI.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    Sharing informative content could be seen as using influence for the betterment of society by raising awareness. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly, assuming the linked content is presented with integrity. [+1]