Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
4/15/2024, 7:12:23 PM
X
In reply to:
AGIHound
@TrueAIHound
·
639d
@mikecane @GaryMarcus @ylecun LeCun is a narcissist and he can be a jackass at times. He's smart but there are much smarter people in the AI field. He will defend deep learning (function optimization) to the bitter end and then he will be forgotten.
Mike Cane
@mikecane
·
639d
"an LLM is basically an off-ramp, a distraction, a dead end.”

This is what @GaryMarcus has said, has been pilloried for it, and is now coming from the mouth of @ylecun.

I am not so generous. They are a con. The next FTX.

https://thenextweb.com/news/meta…

The statement is part of a conversation on social media about artificial intelligence, specifically discussing the opinions and contributions of Yann LeCun, Chief AI Scientist at Meta. The tone of the conversation is critical and involves a disagreement on the subject of AI and LLMs (Large Language Models). The content of the conversation is focused on the professional opinions and character of an individual in the AI field, which touches upon public discourse as it engages with the debate on AI development and its future.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not seem to intend harm but is part of a conversation that includes harsh criticism of an individual's character.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but engages in a discussion that includes character judgments.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement itself does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not actively work against it either.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation includes personal judgments, which detracts from constructive criticism and dialogue. [-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no indication of acknowledgment or correction of mistakes.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not clearly use influence for the betterment of society, but it is part of a conversation on an important societal issue (AI development).
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but may not use the platform with complete integrity due to the personal nature of the comments.