Gary Marcus

The statement '@JohnBrownlow @tunguz Correct' in the context of a Twitter conversation about the development and potential plateauing of Large Language Models (LLMs) constitutes public discourse. It is part of a broader discussion involving public figures and experts in the field of artificial intelligence, addressing the societal implications and future expectations of technological advancements in LLMs.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does no harm as it simply affirms a point in a technical discussion. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity, containing no personal attacks or sensitive information. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   While neutral, the statement does not actively promote understanding beyond affirming a previous point.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages constructively by affirming a clarification in the ongoing dialogue, avoiding any personal attacks. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement contributes to a broader societal understanding of AI development, indirectly using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech responsibly, contributing factually to the discussion without misuse of the platform. [+1]