Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement is a critique of the World Health Organization's new AI chatbot, SARAH, which reportedly provided incorrect medical information. The tone is one of concern and warning, highlighting the potential dangers of relying on AI for critical information like healthcare. The intent is to inform and caution the public about the inaccuracies of the AI system.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to prevent harm by alerting the public to the unreliability of the AI chatbot, which could potentially lead to dangerous situations if the misinformation is acted upon. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by focusing on the issue of the AI's performance rather than attacking any individuals involved in its creation. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By sharing this information, the statement promotes understanding and awareness about the limitations and risks of current AI technology in healthcare. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The critique is constructive, focusing on the shortcomings of the AI system rather than making personal attacks against those who developed or deployed it. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to better society by fostering informed discussions about the safety and reliability of health technology. [+2]