Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 94

The statement 'Ouch. Yet another distribution shift challenge.' in response to a conversation about the challenges in measuring language-understanding abilities of LLMs and a related academic paper, constitutes public discourse. It addresses the ongoing issue of distribution shifts in machine learning models, which is a significant topic in the field of artificial intelligence and its implications for technology and society.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it merely acknowledges a recurring challenge in AI research, without any negative implications or harmful content. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by focusing on the subject matter without derogatory or disrespectful comments towards individuals or groups. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a specific issue (distribution shifts) that is relevant to the discussion, thereby contributing to the broader conversation about AI challenges. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by implicitly suggesting the need for attention to distribution shifts in AI models, which is a constructive approach to problem-solving in this field. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence responsibly by bringing attention to a technical challenge in AI, thus contributing positively to the discourse on improving AI technologies. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by contributing a viewpoint in a public academic discussion, encouraging further dialogue on the topic. [+1]