Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the neutrality and perceived bias of Wikipedia, a major online information platform, in comparison to US news platforms. It suggests that Wikipedia maintains a higher standard of neutrality despite a slight left-wing bias and encourages right-wing culture warriors to contribute positively rather than criticize.
- The statement promotes a constructive approach to improving Wikipedia's neutrality, aiming to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of others by encouraging positive contributions rather than conflict. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement fosters understanding by acknowledging Wikipedia's efforts to maintain neutrality and suggesting a way forward. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by comparing Wikipedia's neutrality to other platforms and suggesting improvement through participation. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges Wikipedia's efforts, which shows a willingness to correct or balance perceptions of bias. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- By suggesting that individuals contribute positively, the statement uses its influence to promote better societal interaction and information sharing. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- It upholds the principles of free speech by encouraging diverse contributions to Wikipedia, enhancing the platform's neutrality and integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.