The statement is a response to a characterization of certain AI critics as a 'frightened mob' wielding 'pitchforks.' The speaker defends their position on seeking a safer AI future and objects to the negative portrayal of their stance.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to clarify the speaker's intentions and corrects a mischaracterization, thus striving to do no harm.
[+1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the dignity of others by objecting to a portrayal that could be seen as demeaning to those concerned about AI safety.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.By clarifying their stance, the speaker promotes understanding and seeks to correct misunderstandings in the discourse.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The speaker engages in constructive criticism by addressing the language used and explaining their position without resorting to personal attacks.
[+1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The speaker uses their influence to advocate for a safer approach to AI, aiming for the betterment of society.
[+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The speaker responsibly uses their platform to engage in a public issue, maintaining integrity in how they address the criticism.
[+1]