Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
4/19/2024, 3:31:15 PM
X
In reply to:
Terence Plizga | terenceplizga@bsky.social
@TerencePlizga
·
441d
@GaryMarcus That guy is not worth debating. He shows no credentials that would give his speculations any weight.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
441d
Excuse me? I for one I am trying to get SAFE AI future. The current technology is not that.

Seeking a sounder basis for AI is not coming at it with “pitchforks” and I greatly object to this characterization, and am calling it out.
Patrick Durusau Seeking Demise of #WhiteSupremacy
@patrickDurusau
·
441d
I'm sure others I have missed, sorry, have made the point, but ...

the #StochasticParrot family, @GaryMarcus, and others are the crowd chasing #Frankenstein with torches and pitchforks.

Are you ready to master the future, or are you part of a frightened mob?

The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of AI safety and the responsible development of technology. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the characterization of those advocating for a safer approach to AI technology, which is a significant societal issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to reduce harm by clarifying misrepresentations, though it does condition further dialogue on an apology, which could be seen as slightly adversarial. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by seeking to correct a misrepresentation without engaging in harassment or derogatory language. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By clarifying a misrepresentation, the statement promotes understanding, though the conditional nature of the response might slightly limit empathy. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by clarifying a point of contention, though it could be more inclusive by continuing the dialogue unconditionally. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement indirectly acknowledges a potential misunderstanding or misrepresentation, aiming to correct it. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for a clearer understanding of positions on AI safety, contributing positively to societal discourse. [+2]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by engaging in public discourse responsibly, focusing on clarifying misunderstandings rather than escalating conflict. [+2]