Gary Marcus

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -32
4/22/2024, 4:28:42 PM
X
In reply to:
Mark Tellez
@_MarkTellez
·
353d
@GaryMarcus @mustafasuleyman @Microsoft all of these things happen without AI too though, Gary.

do you even photoshop? ever done penetration testing? manipulated customer service to expose things?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
353d
😧 How on earth could you say this, @mustafasuleyman @microsoft?

LLMs and related techniques have been used to
• influence elections
• influence markets
• generate nonconsensual deepfake porn
• generate so much child porn the NCEMC is overwhelmed
• write fake books,…
Steve Rosenbaum
@magnifymedia
·
353d
"If you look at the last two or three years, there have been very very few downsides. It's very hard to say what harm an LLM has caused," says Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman. -> @GaryMarcus ?

https://www.ted.com/talks/mustaf…

The statement in question is part of a Twitter conversation that addresses the impact and ethical considerations of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically large language models (LLMs). The discourse involves multiple public figures and engages with significant societal issues such as the potential harms of AI technologies. This qualifies as public discourse as it substantively addresses public concerns about AI's influence on society.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement attempts to highlight the potential dangers of minimizing the impact of powerful technologies like AI, suggesting a concern for the harm they can cause, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By drawing a comparison to emphasize the seriousness of the issue, the statement promotes a deeper understanding of the scale and impact of AI, fostering empathy towards those potentially harmed by such technologies. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by challenging a comparison made by another user, focusing on the argument rather than the individual, thus avoiding personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The user uses their influence in the conversation to highlight significant concerns about AI, aiming for a societal betterment by fostering a more cautious and informed approach to AI development and use. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement contributes responsibly to the discourse on AI, using the platform to raise important ethical considerations, thus upholding the principles of free speech with integrity. [+1]