Gary Marcus

Rank 35 of 47
|
Score -42
4/22/2024, 4:35:40 PM
X
In reply to:
Mark Tellez
@_MarkTellez
·
346d
@GaryMarcus @mustafasuleyman @Microsoft scale and cost is just the marching of human progression.

if you could go back in time would you stop gunpowder?

maybe, but it wouldnt have stopped it from being adopted anyway.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
346d
@_MarkTellez @mustafasuleyman @Microsoft all made much worse. like excusing automatic weapons on the grounds that we have knives. scale and cost matter.
Mark Tellez
@_MarkTellez
·
346d
@GaryMarcus @mustafasuleyman @Microsoft all of these things happen without AI too though, Gary.

do you even photoshop? ever done penetration testing? manipulated customer service to expose things?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
346d
😧 How on earth could you say this, @mustafasuleyman @microsoft?

LLMs and related techniques have been used to
• influence elections
• influence markets
• generate nonconsensual deepfake porn
• generate so much child porn the NCEMC is overwhelmed
• write fake books,…
Steve Rosenbaum
@magnifymedia
·
346d
"If you look at the last two or three years, there have been very very few downsides. It's very hard to say what harm an LLM has caused," says Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman. -> @GaryMarcus ?

https://www.ted.com/talks/mustaf…

The statement is part of a public discourse on the ethical implications and societal risks associated with artificial intelligence (AI), particularly focusing on General AI (GenAI). The speaker expresses concern over the potential dangers of GenAI, suggesting that some uses of AI should be stigmatized similarly to chemical and biological weapons. This indicates a critical stance on the unregulated development and application of certain AI technologies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to prevent harm by advocating for the stigmatization of certain AI uses, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by focusing on the broader societal impact rather than targeting individuals, thus upholding the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By highlighting the potential risks of GenAI, the statement promotes understanding and encourages a cautious approach, fostering empathy and compassion towards those who might be affected by unchecked AI development. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The speaker engages in constructive criticism of AI development practices without resorting to personal attacks, focusing on the issue rather than the individuals involved. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the speaker's influence to advocate for responsible AI development, aiming for the betterment of society by raising awareness of the potential risks. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The speaker uses their platform to engage responsibly in a public debate about AI, contributing to the discourse with integrity and a focus on significant societal issues. [+2]