Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement discusses the potential impact of the upcoming GPT5 on AI companies and the broader AI industry, reflecting on the expectations and possible consequences if it fails to meet the hype. The tone is analytical and somewhat cautionary, focusing on the business and technological implications.
- The statement does not intend to harm but rather to analyze potential outcomes for AI companies with the release of GPT5. It is neutral and factual in its approach. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- While not directly promoting understanding, empathy, or compassion, the statement contributes to a broader understanding of the stakes involved in technological advancements in AI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by setting realistic expectations and preparing the audience for various outcomes without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to inform and possibly temper expectations, contributing to a more informed and realistic perspective among the public and stakeholders in the AI industry. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.