Gary Marcus

Rank 30 of 47
Score 114

The statement by @_MarkTellez engages in public discourse as it addresses significant societal concerns regarding the ethical use and potential dangers of artificial intelligence (AI). The statement specifically discusses the stigmatization of certain technologies and compares the regulation of AI to that of chemical and biological weapons, indicating a substantive engagement with public policy and ethical considerations in technology.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to promote caution and responsible handling of AI, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By advocating for the careful consideration of AI's risks, the statement promotes understanding and compassion regarding the potential negative impacts of technology. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a constructive dialogue about the ethical use of AI, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on the issue at hand. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The speaker uses their influence to advocate for responsible development and regulation of AI, aiming for the betterment of society. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss important ethical issues in technology. [+2]