Gary Marcus

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score 10
4/25/2024, 5:08:57 AM
X
In reply to:
Arun
@ArunSangwan21
·
320d
@GaryMarcus Being a reputed person you may like to choose your words carefully - without proper investigation you seem to be claiming using ‘ FSD’ in use while the article alleged ‘ Autopilot’ in use - while both claims are still not confirmed but for you to even use them interchangeably is…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
320d
⚠️ Perhaps the biggest risk facing the AV industry is that people will be led to trust vehicles that are not fully ready for prime time.

Here, a Tesla driver appears to have put to much faith in FSD, and to have killed a motorcyclist in the process. The Tesla driver has been…
KIRO 7
@KIRO7Seattle
·
322d
Tesla driver arrested for Vehicular Homicide after striking and killing a motorcyclist while on auto pilot. https://www.kiro7.com/news/local…

The statement is part of a public discourse on the safety and reliability of autonomous vehicle technology, specifically addressing the terminology used in reporting incidents involving such technologies. The discourse involves a correction and clarification regarding the terms 'Autopilot' and 'Full Self-Driving (FSD)' used by Tesla, which are crucial in the context of public understanding and the portrayal of autonomous vehicles in media.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to correct misinformation, thereby reducing potential harm that might arise from public misunderstanding of autonomous vehicle technology. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by striving for accuracy in public communication, though it does not directly address privacy issues. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By clarifying the terminology, the statement promotes better understanding among the public regarding the capabilities and limitations of current autonomous vehicle technology. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by correcting a previous assertion, fostering a more informed dialogue without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The speaker acknowledges and corrects a mistake regarding the use of specific terms, which is crucial in maintaining credibility and trust in public discourse. [+2]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The correction serves the betterment of society by contributing to a more accurate discussion about autonomous vehicle safety, which has significant implications for public safety and policy. [+2]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The use of the platform in this case is responsible and shows integrity, as it involves correcting misinformation and contributing to an important public debate. [+2]